|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Centers | Variable Primary Retrofit | Boiler Plants | Analysis | Control Systems | Communications |
|
Before you buy another chiller, ask yourself: Am I getting full production from the equipment I already own? And if not, why not?
You may find what other
facility managers facing the same problem have: the CHW plant's low
return water temperature and wasted flow are making it impossible to reach
the design output. In other words, you are not getting what you paid for.
Before spending big money ripping up your plant, consider conversion to variable primary flow. You'll get back lost capacity and the overall kW / ton is practically guaranteed to go down at the same time. And since VP conversion typically involves only minor mechanical changes you'll have less logistical headaches and a smaller bill to boot. How does VP Conversion make this possible?
In
plants with traditional primary/secondary hydronic design, the
constant speed primary pumps deliver a fixed flow, so cooling capacity
drops in direct proportion to the decrease in actual delta T as
compared to the design delta T. The result: lag chillers (along with
associated CDW pumps and CT fans) must be sequenced on earlier
thereby wasting significant energy. Further, maximum capacity is
reduced (refer to the chart above, where a 4 degree drop
in delta T limits a 1200 ton plant to only 800
tons.
That's exactly what the people at Berger Hospital found.
(You can click
the picture above for a case study.)
In addition to getting a 50% increase in capacity, the people at Berger also found
that their energy consumption went down as well. This is always the case in a
conversion because the chillers run in the most efficient part of their range more
often, and the lead chiller can handle the load alone for a much greater portion of
the time.
|
|
![]() |
© Copyright 2009 tekWorx, LLC. |